The government has
met the enemy and it is us—the historic American nation.
Washington's long war on its own people has broken into the open, with reports that the National Security Agency, among others, has been
spying on the phone calls and emails of American citizens. But at the same time, the Amnesty Establishment and its lackeys in the GOP claim that it is simply impossible to enforce immigration laws,
deport illegals, or even build a border fence.
The simple truth: the feds can accomplish a lot if they want to—but reading your emails is higher on their priority list than
fulfilling the fundamental responsibility of government.What gives the game away: the reaction of the Treason Lobby’s Republican collaborators:
- Senator Lindsey Graham (Scalawag-SC), who grows more prissy and hysterical as he ages, cried last month that “You can't build a fence high enough to stop people” because people in Mexico are fleeing a “hellhole.” (It was left for Senator Jeff Sessions to point out that Mexico is not actually a hellhole, being fairly rich by global standards).
But while Graham thinks it is simply impossible to build a border fence, he thinks it is eminently feasible to censor every letter in the country. [
Lindsey Graham: ‘If I thought censoring the mail was necessary, I would suggest it’, By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News, June 11, 2013] Graham is also “
glad” the national security agency intercepts phone records and emails. [
GOP Sen. Graham says he’s ‘glad’ NSA is collecting phone records, By Seth McLaughlin,
Washington Times, June 6, 2013]He made a possible Freudian slip when he
mused that “
bloggers” might not be entitled to
First Amendment protections. Finally, he wants to
chase whistleblower Edward Snowden to “the ends of the earth.”
Like Graham, Rubio claims that the government
simply “can't deport millions.” But he has seemingly infinite faith in the
right of the federal government to monitor American communications without a warrant. He
claims it is “simply a reality” because “The threat that we face—largely radical, political Islamists—is probably a threat that is going to exist for the rest of our lifetimes.”
Of course, the reason this threat exists—aside from our adventurist foreign policy, which Rubio supports—is because of the U.S. government's fanaticism
in allowing in ever more Muslim immigrants. Even now, as it becomes clear that the American government is backing a
losing effort side in
Syria, the State Department is scheming to
inflict tens of thousands of Syrian aliens on helpless American towns and cities. But the Obama Administration—with the help of collaborators like Rubio—is simultaneously
halting background checks on immigrants so as to facilitate the Third World invasion.
So much for preventing terrorism.
- Senator John McCain (MSM—Arizona). When running against immigration patriot primary opponent J. D. Hayworth, McCain conceded that we should “build the dang fence” if it would make the peasants happy. Now, safely ensconced in office, he's shamelessly returned to his efforts to destroy his party and his people in Arizona as a leader of the Gang of 8.
McCain now of course believes that a fence is unnecessary and wouldn't work—apparently only his Israeli friends are
allowed to protect their country. He also engages in some
concern trolling about cost.
But McCain is totally confident about the government's claim to monitor the communications of Americans and seems to have no concern about the costs of a permanent and extensive national security establishment.
Arguing against Senator Rand Paul, McCain
argues that America is a battlefield. Thanks to his de facto open borders policy, he's
right.
- Speaker John Boehner, fresh from his daughter's wedding to a dreadlocked Jamaican pothead, announced that he would do his best to make sure the Republican House would not oppose an immigration bill and would debate it. He chirped happily that they could have a bill by the “end of the year.”
Boehner was praised by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,
who of course is deeply concerned about the Republican Party's
relationship to Latino voters.
My assessment: While Boehner may occasionally make noise about border security, his real concern is giving himself political cover so he can
work against the interests of his own supporters. As with many Republicans, Boehner is executing a delicate balancing act, trying to deliver cheap labor for his masters while doing his best to
make an Amnesty betrayal look like something other than what it is.
(In the latest twist, “sources familiar with his plans” say
John Boehner won't back immigration bill without majority GOP support—by David M. Drucker,
Washington Examiner, June 16 2013. We’ll see).
But Boehner showed no such tactical delicacy when it came to Edward Snowden. He
called Snowden a “traitor”—which presumably means that Snowden should be killed.
So reporting on the government's activities against citizens is treason, while working to dispossess those citizens is apparently just a higher form of patriotism.
As for Senator Paul himself, he has issued blistering
criticism of the National Security Agency, and claims that the government is
looking at a “billion phone calls a day.”
But Senator Paul's fears about the awesome power of “The State” apparently do not extend to their ability to build a wall. In a typically
confused gesture, Senator Paul will offer an amendment that will give the government
five years to build a border fence—the same one that has already been mandated.
Also, he will require Congress to vote on whether the border is secure—according to the opinions of Congress, rather than any objective standard. As Chuck Schumer is
promising that the current bill will make illegal immigration “a thing of the past,” it's not much of a stretch to judge that the junior Senator from Kentucky has not thought this through.
Paul also wants to ban any form of a
national ID—the same
objection that killed the 1986 Amnesty's enforcement provisions.
Not surprisingly, last week Paul voted with the majority
to move Amnesty forward.
Liberals, neoconservatives and libertarians all accept that the federal government has the power to tap the phone calls, read the emails, and even the censor the letters of millions of Americans. But all these groups somehow believe that this same all powerful government is incapable of
building a wall in a
timely fashion, enforcing current laws, or
deporting illegals (even when the illegals in question are testifying before the Senate). All also ignore the obvious truth—immigration laws aren't ignored because the government
can't enforce them, they are ignored because the
government won't enforce them.Furthermore, mass immigration of hostile Third Worlders practically guarantees a never-ending terrorist threat—which of course provides further justification for the
permanent national security state libertarians claim to oppose.
The Amnesty Establishment and its apologists are a comically obvious example of what the late
Sam Francis called “
anarcho-tyranny”: the government cracks down on law-abiding citizens while blithely ignoring (and even encouraging) criminality, parasitism, and outright treason.
Any talk of defending against terrorism or extreme actions in the name of national security simply cannot be taken seriously when elected officials refuse to enforce laws that might actually solve the problem.
The American government would rather impose tyranny on citizens than inconvenience the invaders—and the silence of Conservativism Inc., liberals, and libertarians tells us all we need to know about who sets the parameters of debate in Occupied America.
While Americans are
distracted by passing issues and Conservatism Inc. profiteers off phony scandals, the nation-breaking Amnesty/ Immigration Surge is proceeding.
This real message of last week: mass immigration, amnesty, and the undoing of the American nation is statism in action.
Both stopping terrorism and preserving what's left of limited government require border security. If Senators and Congressmen don't make the connection, they don't deserve to be taken seriously.
James Kirkpatrick [Email him] travels around the United States looking for a waiter who can speak English.
