Reconquista DJ Eddie "Piolin" Sotelo Not Only Accused Of Sexual Harassment, But Of Falsifying Letters In Support Of Amnesty

A timely post from www.Vdare.com about the radio DJ “Piolin.” This follows this post about the University of Washington mandating an anti-white, anti-male, anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-heterosexual class. In the meantime, you can read an interesting take on society's problems HERE and another interesting book HERE.

More On Reconquista DJ Eddie "Piolin" Sotelo Falsifying Letters In 2007—This Seems To Have Been Unlucky For Everyone Involved

http://www.vdare.com/posts/more-on-reconquista-dj-eddie-piolin-sotelo-falsifying-letters-in-2007

By James Fulford on July 30, 2013 at 5:59pm

More details of this accusation against Eddie "Piolin" Sotelo: 

That letter [a lawyer's letter obtained by the Times] also contains Cortez's claims about falsifying letters. According to Cortez, after the immigration reform drive fell well short of garnering the 1 million letters that Sotelo had pledged to deliver, Sotelo ordered his staffers to "clandestinely photocopy letters so that it would appear as if he had gathered 1 million signatures." Clayton writes that Cortez "initially refused but was told in no uncertain terms that the team needed to comply."
In June 2007, Sotelo traveled to Washington, D.C., to present the letters to a congressional delegation composed of Sens. Edward Kennedy, Mel Martinez, Robert Menendez and Arlen Specter, as well as members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
'Piolin' Sotelo, Univision parting follows harassment allegations, By Reed Johnson and Meg James, July 29, 2013

Here's a contemporary report of that trip: Popular disc jockey goes to Washington with 1 million letters, AP, June 11, 2007.
Those "million signatures" seem to have been bad luck.
Since then, Kennedy has died, Mel Martinez has resigned his Senate seat to cash in as a lobbyist, Arlen Specter switched parties, was defeated in a primary, and died, and Robert Menendez narrowly escaped prosecution over his sexual conduct. And now El Piolin has lost his job!

Reconquista DJ Eddie "Piolin" Sotelo Not Only Accused Of Sexual Harassment, But Of Falsifying Letters In Support Of Amnesty

http://www.vdare.com/posts/reconquista-dj-eddie-piolin-sotelo-not-only-accused-of-sexual-harassment-but-of-falsifying-let

By James Fulford on July 30, 2013 at 4:57pm

From the KTLA website:

LOS ANGELES — Spanish-language radio personality Eddie “Piolin” Sotelo’s mysterious departure from the airwaves last week came after a performer on his nationally syndicated program accused him of sexual harassment, according to documents obtained by The Times.
Alberto “Beto” Cortez, a writer, producer and performer on the popular “Piolin por la Manana” radio program, alleged that his boss Sotelo was “physically, sexually and emotionally harassing” him for a three-year period ending last January. The claim was made in an April 16 letter from Cortez attorney Robert R. Clayton to executives Roberto Llamas and Jose Valle of Univision Communications Inc., which broadcast and syndicated the show.
In addition to the claim of sexual harassment, Cortez alleged that Sotelo ordered members of his radio production team to falsify letters in support of a high-profile campaign for congressional immigration reform, an issue that Sotelo championed on his program.[Emphasis added]

El Piolin (the nickname means "Tweety Bird" in Mexican Spanish) has supporting amnesty for years, and we've got a lot of material on him. Last year, Brenda Walker wrote

When thousands of illegal aliens show up for May Day marches demanding amnesty, part of the organizing comes from Spanish radio and TV which urge unlawful foreigners to complain en masse. In Los Angeles, local Mexican radio guy Piolin is credited with turning out huge crowds of amnesty pests.

Piolin is reported to have "entered the US illegally on a forged green card," in 1986 and presumably was amnestied as a result of IRCA.

Vote on English in U.S. Senate

A very interesting post from  http://www.proenglish.org/ about an English language amendment to S.744. This follows this post about Marco Rubio's alienation from his base. This follows this post about some Republican Senators to be watching for on S.744. This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

Tell your Senators: Vote YES on the Fischer English Amdt!

Take Action!

http://www.proenglish.org/   Senator Deb Fischer (R-Nebraska) has just introduced an amendment that will address one of the gaping loopholes in the Senate immigration bill.  
Under her amendment (Amdt. No. 1348), an illegal alien applying for amnesty who cannot meet minimum English standards will be ineligible for legal status and a work permit.
S. 744 currently contains no provisions to require illegal aliens to demonstrate any English language ability prior to being awarded immediate legal status and work permits. Without her amendment, legalized aliens are able to renew their temporary legal status every six years for the rest of their lives without ever being subjected to an English language test!

TAKE ACTION!

Your Senators need to hear from you!  They need to know that you expect them to vote YES on the Fischer amendment.
Failing to provide a strong English language requirement in this massive amnesty proposal will increase the already hefty tax burden on Americans to fund translations and interpreters services.  After all, this legislation is projected to usher in 33 million new immigrants by the year 2024! 

Call and email your Senators now!

TAKE ACTION!

The Senate debate is currently very fluid and the Fischer English amendment could be brought to a vote at any time, as early as tonight!

Call your Senators NOW and tell them to vote YES on the

Fischer English Amendment (#1348)!

"READ THE BILL" RALLY AGAINST SENATE AMNESTY

A very interesting post from http://capsweb.org  about a rally against the "Gang of Eight" amnesty bill S.744. This follows this post about Rush Limbaugh not covering the Gang of Eight amnesty bill. This follows this post about the racial componant of the "Gang of Eight" Bill.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

 

 

"READ THE BILL" RALLY AGAINST SENATE AMNESTY

 

 

The Senate will begin debate this week about S. 744, the Senate's 'Amnesty First, Border Security Maybe' bill. If passed, this bill will grant amnesty to 11 million illegal aliens, give out 33 million work visas, and cost American taxpayers over $6 trillion.

Thanks to your donations and faxes, CAPS will be delivering reading glasses to U.S. Senators insisting that they READ THE BILL (S 744, the immigraton-amnesty bill) and vote AGAINST amnesty. Afterwards, we will host a rally to show WHY they should read the bill.

WHO: Californians For Population Stabilization

 

WHEN: 11 a.m.  Tuesday, June 11, 2013

 

WHERE: Corner of 2^nd and C Streets, NE, near Senate Office Buildings, Washington, D.C.

 

WHY: To show most Senators why they need to read the bill: 

1. Border security. What will it look like if it’s amnesty first, border security later?
2. Joblessness.  What do you see happening if 33 million more foreign workers are given new, lifetime work permits over the next 10 years at a time when 20 million Americans are jobless?
3. Skyrocketing welfare costs. What is your vision of America’s future when taxpayers have to pay over $6 trillion in welfare for illegal aliens?

We will ask the Senate to please read the bill and tell us.

Visuals: 

• Posters with a photo of Sen. Rubio with eyeglasses drawn on his face.  "He needs reading glasses because apparently he has not read his own immigration bill."
•  Copy of S. 744 itself. It's a lot to read! Over 1,000 pages and weighing 26.6 lbs.
•  A bathroom scale for anyone wanting to weigh the bill for themselves.

 

Background: Californians for Population Stabilization is launching an ad campaign that accuses Sen. Rubio of needing reading glasses because apparently he has not read his own immigration bill.  The print advertising campaign launches tomorrow, Tuesday, June 11, on Facebook, in Washington, D.C. and in Florida. The ad shows Sen. Rubio with reading glasses drawn on his face, and asks readers to send him any extra eyeglasses to help clear things up.

 

Schedule:

9 a.m.  Supporters will meet at 2^nd and C Streets NE to deliver eyeglasses to each Senate office with a flier, "READ THE BILL."

 

11 – 12 noon: "READ THE BILL" Rally held at the corner of 2^nd and C Streets NE near the Senate buildings.  Please bring signs and posters.

The event is sponsored by Californians for Population Stabilization, an advocacy group that works to formulate and advance policies and programs designed to stabilize the population of California, the U.S. and the world at levels which will preserve the environment and a good quality of life for all.

If you live or are in the Washington, D.C. area and would like to help, please contact Californians for Population Stabilization by replying to this email, or calling (805) 564-6626.

Keep up the fight!

Gretchen Pfaff

Associate Director

Has Rush Limbaugh been Zuckerberged?

A very interesting post from www.VDare.com about Rush Limbaugh not covering the Gang of Eight amnesty bill. This follows this post about the "Gang of Eight" amnesty bill S.744.  This follows this post about the racial componant of the "Gang of Eight" Bill.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

Has Rush Limbaugh been Zuckerberged? (2)

http://www.vdare.com/posts/has-rush-limbaugh-been-zuckerberged-2

By Patrick Cleburne

H/T One Old Vet

Our Talk Radio Correspondent weighed in yesterday:

Friday, Laura Ingraham...said that she had heard the Zuckerberg immigration ads with Ryan and Rubio on "talk radio". She said that she didn't think they were running on her show and added: “I certainly hope they aren't”. She said she didn't want to make money that way. She said that immigration is by far the most important issue and that she is devoting more than 50% of her time to it. [In contrast, the Zuckerberg ads run at least twice an hour on the Limbaugh show, and I haven't heard him mention immigration since his return from vacation on Wednesday.]

(My emphasis.)

Laura Ingraham – who has clearly emerged as the most important patriotic talk show host this Amnesty cycle - has raised the financial importance of the Zuckerberg Ad campaign before: Laura Ingraham: Zuckerberg Ad Revenue Silencing "Conservative" Talk Show Hosts. And I noted that Limbaugh had fallen silent before he went on vacation:  Has Rush Limbaugh Been Zuckerberged? May 24 2013.

But I believe Limbaugh is too strong financially to be much concerned about the Zuckerberg Ad revenues (although I hope he is charging these skunks a premium price). Furthermore he really understands this issue and can be excellent on it (if erratic).

I think the probability is that he is disgusted. Having taken a very brave stand - Cabal of Leftists and RINOs Attempt to Destroy Heritage Scholar Jason Richwine rushlimbaugh.com May 10, 2013 – he was hung out to dry by the cowardice of the Heritage Foundation and Jim DeMint.

And of course there are so many exciting scandals to discuss. There was a brief moment on Thursday when he curiously shied away from an articulate Amnesty caller: Why Illegals Want Citizenship RushLimbaugh.com June 06, 2013. To his credit he came back after the break he had abruptly declared to accurately say

…why would illegals want to become citizens?  It's called chain immigration.  They can bring in all their relatives without having to pay to have 'em snuck across the border.  They can increase their demands.

However he also said

I didn't get a chance to talk about Rubio may be pulling out of the Gang of Eight.  Not sure if that's true but we'll talk about it tomorrow.

which he did not.

All of us feel disgusted at this process. I hope Rush Limbaugh masters his feelings.

His country needs him.

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about Talk Radio suppressing the immigration amnesty response. This follows this post about lies in the "Gang of Eight" amnesty bill.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are

shown HERE.

WALL STREET JOURNAL Claims Americans Aren't On Fire Over Amnesty—Because Talk Radio Has Been Bought Off?

http://www.vdare.com/posts/wall-street-journal-claims-americans-arent-on-fire-over-amnesty-because-talk-radio-has-been-bo

By Brenda Walker

In Washington, the Congressional offices are not reporting much activity from citizens opposing the massive Senate amnesty bill and that the phone calls are nothing like what happened during the 2007 victory against anarchy.
On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal gave the subject a page-top treatment with a photo of citizens speaking out against amnesty in Phoenix:

Part of the problem is likely the buying off of talk radio “conservatives” with big-money ad purchases (paid by Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg), particularly of Senator Rubio lying up a storm about how conservative the bill is, how filled with enforcement it is, blah blah. Those ads have run heavily on Rush Limbaugh’s show, among others. Limbaugh has recently begun speaking of amnesty again, but such a death threat to traditional America needs constant reinforcement, does it not? Perhaps he heard from enough irate listeners that buying into the Rubio snake oil is not acceptable.

We Won’t Be Distracted from Amnesty, RushLimbaugh.com Transcript, May 28, 2013
RUSH: By the way, Chris Cillizza’s point, that piece that I was sharing with you about how all of these scandals are distracting everybody away from amnesty, not here. And I just want to reiterate with all of these things that are going on, amnesty is the biggie, folks, because if amnesty is achieved, then all the rest of this is academic, and we basically have a one-party government and country for at least a generation. By the way, Chris Cillizza, even in his story, Chris Cillizza’s point was that the IRS scandals were distracting talk radio from raising the alarm about amnesty. He admitted that it was talk radio that stopped amnesty in 2007.
Chris Cillizza, the Washington Post. And he said all these other scandals — Benghazi, IRS — are providing cover for amnesty, got talk radio distracted, so they know where their real problems lie. Cillizza admits it. But here’s the point. The amnesty bill, as it’s written, or the pathway to citizenship bill, delays citizenship for a number of years. That’s why you’re hearing pathway to citizenship. Well, what’ll happen, the theory is — and it’s a good one — what’ll happen is if the law is passed, then it’ll immediately be challenged, that this citizenship provision is unconstitutional. You can’t bring these people out of shadows. You can’t grant them this. You can’t do that. They’re citizens now, and all you need is one Obama judge, one liberal judge, and they’re not hard to find these days, and, bammo, you’ve got instant citizenship, instant voting.

FAIR recently posted a list of 40 things wrong with S. 744 which could be helpful talking points, but the important thing callers should be saying is that the bill hurts American workers and taxpayers, and they want it voted down. Legalizing lawbreaking is no way for a great nation to deal with a vexing problem.
Here’s the text of the WSJ article:

Immigration Bill Slow to Stir Foes’ Passion, Wall Street Journal, May 28, 2013
Fierce Backlash That Derailed 2007 Overhaul Bid Has Yet to Materialize, Though Opponents Vow to Intensify Campaign
Grass-roots activists were instrumental in derailing the previous attempt by Congress to overhaul immigration laws, in 2007. This time, they have yet to ignite a similar fire.
Coordinated rallies last week to oppose the current bipartisan immigration legislation drew sparse crowds, with fewer than 10 people showing up for a protest in Dover, Del. The number of phone calls to lawmakers’ offices opposing the bill has been a fraction of what it was six years ago. As a discussion topic on conservative talk radio in recent weeks, immigration has ranked behind issues such as Syria-Israel tensions and President Barack Obama’s speech on counterterrorism.
“This time I am getting this sense of resignation,” said Rusty Childress, a veteran opponent of illegal immigration in Phoenix. “We have to awaken the sleeping giant.”
The current immigration bill, introduced by a group of senators known as the “Gang of Eight,” would provide a pathway to citizenship to about 11 million people illegally in the U.S. and create new work-visa programs. It also would require beefed-up border security and employment verification before steps to legalize undocumented immigrants could kick in.
Opponents of the bill say that, like the 2007 effort, it amounts to amnesty for law breakers and doesn’t stanch the flow of illegal immigration. Adding legalized immigrants to the workforce would disadvantage jobless Americans, they say.
But this year’s bill hasn’t stirred as much opposition. It has more support from mainstream Republicans eager to improve the party’s standing with the fast-growing Hispanic population, and from many evangelical Christian leaders. Also, a steep drop in illegal immigration in recent years has meant fewer television images of migrants sneaking into the country.
Even so, prospects for the bill’s passage appear mixed. The Senate legislation hasn’t yet been tested in that chamber, and efforts by a bipartisan House group to write a similarly broad bill haven’t succeeded. The path to citizenship provision of the Senate bill could prove particularly troubling in the House.
Meantime, opponents promise to intensify their campaign. Mr. Childress leads “Remember 1986,” a group named after the year of the last big immigration overhaul, signed by President Ronald Reagan. The group sponsored the coordinated rallies last week, many of which were dwarfed by larger protests the same day against the Internal Revenue Service over its scrutiny of conservative nonprofits. Mr. Childress said his group would start targeting a tea-party base that he said is “newly energized” since the IRS news broke.
A fierce backlash against the bill six years ago ultimately spelled its demise because it prompted lawmakers such as Georgia Republican Sens. Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss, who helped draft sections of the measure, to withdraw support. “The backlash began as soon as an outline for a bill was announced, and it was relentless,” said Joan Kirchner, a top aide to Mr. Isakson. Neither of the Georgia senators has taken a public position on this year’s bill.
In recent weeks, Mr. Isakson’s office has been receiving about 100 calls a day compared with as many as 2,000 a day in 2007. The volume is expected to rise if a bill reaches the floor, Ms. Kirchner said, “but signs are it won’t be as intense.” Activists said they are planning a protest outside Mr. Isakson’s Atlanta office in early June.
Michael Harrison, publisher of Talkers, a talk-radio trade magazine, said many influential hosts have “moved on” to discuss gun control, health care and other “hit topics” because “the public’s attitude is different on immigration.”
Alan Ogushoff, who made protest calls to Mr. Chambliss’s office in 2007, often several times a day, said he remains a foe of any legalization. But, the avid listener of conservative talk radio said, “I’m just going to let this happen and move on; I’m burned out fighting it.”
Roy Beck, president of NumbersUSA, a national group that channeled grass-roots opposition to the 2007 bill into a barrage of calls, faxes and emails to lawmakers, agreed “there may be some fatigue” now. Still, the group over the weekend said it unveiled TV and radio ads opposing the bill in 18 states. One radio script warning of the dangers of adding more potential workers says: “Jobs—20 million of our friends, family and neighbors still can’t find one.”
Groups pressing for an immigration overhaul, such as businesses and undocumented youngsters, also have been more vocal. The Evangelical Immigration Table, made up of leaders of Christian organizations, this week will launch another round of national radio ads to promote the overhaul.
“This time, there is not as much emotion on our side,” said Mr. Beck of NumbersUSA. But, “I don’t know if that means there is less resolve.”

A very interesting post from www.VDare.com about Rush Limbaugh's immigration coverage. This follows this post about

"Gang of Eight" Amnesty Bill.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

 

Limbaugh Talking Immigration Again

http://www.vdare.com/posts/limbaugh-talking-immigration

By James Fulford
We've had mostly bad news or no news on Rush Limbaugh's immigration coverage, but today, according to a friend who listens to talk radio, he's paying attention:

Limbaugh was talking about immigration in the last half hour of his program.

(He must be getting calls complaining about the new Zuckerberg ad.)

According to him, the immigration bill is about three things:

(1) votes—the Democrats know they're going to get them and the Republicans think the bill is going to pass and they have to get on board.

(2) cheap labor.

(3) the Democrats want a permanent underclass. In his discussion, Limbaugh mentioned low ability as a problem with the immigrants.

"Is there anything else this could really be about? Not to me."

Transcript here.

• Yes, Virginia, (Dare) People Are Opposing Obama-Rubio Amnesty

P. Diddy Wet the Bed

A very interesting post from www.rushlimbaugh.com about a confession by P.Diddy, an ex-boyfriend of Jennifer Lopez. This follows this post about Ashley Judd's Senate run. This follows this post about a race hoax at U.T. Austin.  This follows this post about Emmit Till. In the meantime, you can read two very interesting books HERE.

P. Diddy Wet the Bed
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/quick_hits_page
RUSH: I could just vamp and talk about P. Diddy and low-information news until the president's finished.  Did you know that P. Diddy admitted to being a bedwetter?  P. Diddy was actually a bedwetter, and this is news.  Don't laugh in there, Mr. Snerdley.  It's giving other people self-esteem out there.  I mean, if P. Diddy can be a bedwetter, well, heck, who knows.  "Sean 'Diddy' Combs Reveals He Was a Bed Wetter as a Kid."  He said, "'One thing I want to say is, I grew up as a Kool-Aid kid,' Diddy said, admitting he never drank water. 'I used to pour a half a pound of sugar into the Kool-Aid. Besides it having me bouncing off the walls, I used to be a bedwetter.'"
You know, let that soak in for a second, folks.  I guess it's a new thing for street cred.  Well, Al Roker admits pooping in his pants.  Look, this is what's gonna happen 'til the president finishes, folks.  I'm sorry, I'm not gonna let this guy cover up what I've got to say here.  So Al Roker poops in his pants at the White House and is proud of it, admits it.  Rachel, did you hear about that?  He admitted it on the Today show, not once, but twice, he's talked to people about it. He's asked other people if they ever pooped in their pants.  It was because of his gastric bypass surgery.  He didn't mean to do it.  He couldn't stop it. He couldn't get to the bathroom fast enough.
He's talking about this kind of stuff.  Not that long ago you wouldn't dare mention anything like that, and if you did you'd be a laughingstock.  But Al Roker assumed hero status for having the guts and the courage to admit that he had the problem, and now we got P. Diddly admitting that he was a bedwetter as a kid.

Jennifer Lopez Pic from www.imdb.com