A timely post about from www.Vdare.com about a battle against White Americans. This follows this post about a call to murder white people in the U.S. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Kevin MacDonald On Emerging White Political Independence

http://www.vdare.com/posts/kevin-macdonald-on-emerging-white-political-independence

By Patrick Cleburne    

The New Yorker: Here be Evil Whites!

I noted in POLITICO Big Foot Asserts Allegiance In Obamacare Ethnic War that the Left was becoming very explicit in formulating the Obamacare/Debt ceiling fight as a battle against White Americans. I see Kevin MacDonald, providing his characteristic intellectual leadership, has posted a systematic exposition of this in Implicit White Sightings: Shutting Down the Government and Talk of Secession
He keys off a war cry in The New Yorker Where the G.O.P.'s Suicide Caucus Lives By Ryan Lizza September 26 2013 from which the above map comes.  This denounces the GOP Congressmen brave enough to demand Obamacare defunding on the grounds that they represent whiter than average districts.

MacDonald reviews other examples of Left allegations of racial motivation and goes on

The thing is, I think these comments are basically right. It is about race and has been for some time and getting more so. A theme at TOO is the racialization of American politics. Liberals…think that they can transform the country by encouraging identity politics for Blacks and other minorities while making Whites an identity-less minority whose only function is to be economically milked by programs like Obamacare...

Liberals wring their hands and talk about how the White working class is not voting its economic interests, but these White people are definitely acting in tune with their ethnic interests, if only implicitly. Only a brain dead Marxist still worshiping at the altar of class warfare could fail to see that the political fault lines are fast becoming based on race, not social class.

Peter Brimelow’s version of this was Yes, It Is About Race. Quite Right Too.

MacDonald concludes

The left is gloating because they have transformed the country to the point where they are on the verge of a permanent majority with a non-White voting base.  Whites are rebelling. At this point, the rebellion is only implicitly a racial thing, but it may not be long before it becomes explicit. And that would be transformative.

One thing it will transform is the political structure on the Conservative/Right side. The emergence of a Generic American Party is inevitable – either by transforming or displacing the Republicans.

The Left (and the GOP Establishment)'s only hope of preventing this is by vigorous repression relying on Hitler’s Revenge.

It will not work.

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about the Massachusetts Senate election. This follows this post about the  DC March for Jobs against more immigration. This follows this post about the Thursday morning Senate amnesty vote.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

Bingo! Clown slips on banana peel

Go to YouTubePlay video Ronnie Numbers, of The New Orleans Bingo! Show, entering a hotel, where a high school reunion is taking place, in Easton, PA, slips on - a banana peel - on his way into the lobby after a show. 00:00:12 Added on 11/24/06 5,861 views

 

Gabriel “Gang Of Nine” Gomez Loses Both Hispanics AND Whites in Massachusetts

http://www.vdare.com/articles/gabriel-gang-of-nine-gomez-loses-both-hispanics-and-whites-in-massachusetts

By Matthew Richer    

[Previously by Matthew Richer The Marco Rubio Of Massachusetts: Will The GOP Establishment And Its Token Hispanic Gabriel Gomez Blow This Election Too]
Watching the Republican Party’s current obsession with “Hispanic outreach” reminds one of the circus clown whose routine consists of tossing banana peels in front of himself, then slipping and falling flat on his back.
Early in the special election campaign to replace John Kerry in the U.S. Senate, it was clear that the Massachusetts GOP Establishment had handpicked Gabriel Gomez as their candidate, and for only one reason—he’s Hispanic.
Just as being black was the only reason Deval Patrick was elected Governor and Barack Obama elected President, being Hispanic was the only reason Gabriel Gomez received the GOP nomination for the Senate.
When asked about his qualifications, Gomez constantly repeated the fact that he had served as a Navy SEAL. Unfortunately, military service does not impress a lot of voters here in the Bay State, and “Navy SEAL Gabriel Gomez” quickly became an irritating soundbite.
True, Gomez did join a successful private equity firm after his military service, but one has to wonder if he was just an Affirmative Action hire. He never really seemed to understand economic policy very well—especially given that he is a huge booster for the nation-bankrupting Gang of Eight Amnesty/ Immigration Surge.
During the debates, Gabriel Gomez deliberately chided his Democratic opponent, Ed Markey (NumbersUSA F) for being too weak a proponent of the Gang of Eight amnesty and actually vowed to outdo the Democrat on this issue. ““I want to make it a ‘Gang of Nine,’” Gomez promised again and again.  Gomez: We’ll win ‘with or without DC’, by Jessica Taylor, June 25, 2013
You can’t make this stuff up.
Every time Gomez uttered this “Gang of Nine” remark, it was obvious that he really believed that he was delivering a decisive blow against his opponent. But the only people wincing were potential voters.
The “Gang of Nine” sound bite was obviously pre-rehearsed. Who can doubt that Gomez’s consultants went over it with him many times before the debates? Clearly they believed that it would be a real zinger.
In fact, Gabriel Gomez hired many of the same consultants who engineered the defeats of John McCain in 2008, and Mitt Romney and Scott Brown in 2012, including Eric “Etch-a-Sketch” Fehrnstrom, and Lenny Alcivar of Hynes Communications. [Giving boost to Senate hopeful Gabriel Gomez, conservative super PAC takes aim at Democrat Ed Markey, By Robert Rizzuto, MassLive.com, April 24, 2013 ]
Additionally, Gomez spoke Spanish on television, in campaign ads, and even before exclusively English-speaking audiences.
The amusing thing is that Gomez’s shameless hispandering didn’t even win him any Hispanic votes. The state’s largest Spanish-speaking newspaper, El Planeta, endorsed Ed Markey just before Gomez’s well-advertised (but sparsely attended) “Latino Townhall” in Southbridge, MA. [El Planeta Newspaper endorses Ed Markey, TuBoston.com, June 13, 2013]
Not that it mattered. Even if Gomez received 100% of the Hispanic vote, it would not have improved his chances of winning. Besides, most Hispanic voters in Massachusetts are Puerto Ricans who aren’t interested in Amnesty. But Puerto Ricans do support the Democratic Party because, like most Hispanics, they are natural Democrats.
Ed Markey ended up winning 55% of the vote, despite the fact that turnout was abysmally low.  [Edward Markey wins a low-turnout, big-spending Massachusetts Senate race, By Ryan Lenora Brown, Christian Science Monitory, June 26, 2013]
While hispandering didn’t win the Republicans any new votes, it cost them plenty, including many former Scott Brown supporters who chose to stay home. And let’s be honest: those Scott Brown voters were almost entirely white voters.
This was really a squandered opportunity because Gabriel Gomez lost to a very weak candidate. Before this year, Ed Markey was hardly a household name in Massachusetts. He was just one of those Democratic congressmen who had been around forever and no one seemed to know why. In a lot of districts, if you keep your mouth shut and vote the party line, you can get you reelected for as long as you like, which has been 37 years in Ed Markey’s case.
However, if the Democrats have an Achilles heel it is surely immigration.
For example, a viable GOP nominee could have made an issue out of the Matthew Denice case. It would have been the perfect opportunity to embarrass the Democrats and to illustrate the madness of our immigration policies.
As VDARE.com has previously reported, 23 year old Matthew Denice of Milford, MA was killed in 2011 by a drunk-driving Ecuadorean illegal immigrant named Nicolas Dutan Guaman. In the middle of the day, Guaman blew a stop sign and crashed into Denice’s motorcycle. Denice was still alive as Guaman’s pickup dragged him a quarter of a mile. After Denice became dislodged, Guaman backed up over him and sped away. Fortunately, the police caught up with him. [Timeline: Matthew Denice Case |Nineteen months after the death of Milford's Matthew Denice, no trial has been scheduled, By Mary MacDonald, Milford Patch, March 29, 2013]
What makes this tragedy particularly scandalous: Nicolas Guaman had been arrested previously for, among other things, assaulting a police officer and a firefighter. But because of the sanctuary policies that Democratic Governor Deval Patrick supports, Guaman was always released and never reported to ICE.
Even worse, last spring Judge Janet Kenton-Walker, a Deval Patrick appointee, ruled that Guaman’s trial would be postponed indefinitely because of his “unique cultural and linguistic background.” [Justice A Foreign Word For Judge, by Howie Carr, HowieCarrShow.com. April 14, 2013]. Translation: Guaman doesn’t speak English or Spanish, but an Andean dialect with no written form, and it will take many months for the court to find an attorney and an interpreter who can communicate with him (at significant public expense). [McPhee: Dangerous judge in Milford case, The MetroWest Daily News, April 14, 2013]
How many backward South American peasants like Nicolas Guaman will be amnestied under the Gang of Eight bill? It’s an important question—which Gabriel Gomez was not interested in asking.
A credible Republican candidate could have forced Ed Markley to defend the sanctuary policies that produced this travesty of justice and prolonged the suffering of Matthew Denice’s friends and family. But instead, Gomez mouthed vapid immigration happy talk—no doubt with the enthusiastic approval of his consultants.
Russell Kirk used to caution those on the Right that conservatism should not be allowed to morph into an ideology—a warning that has flummoxed some conservatives who believe that adhering to an ideology is a strength, as long as it is the correct ideology. But for Kirk, an ideology is a political worldview in which one is emotionally invested.
The problem with Conservatism Inc. is that they have become emotionally invested in their vision of the Hispanic Republican. They have constructed a mental moat around the idea and all the logic and evidence we muster will not penetrate through to them—not even losing elections, which they’ve been doing a lot of lately.
In fact, losing only convinces these Republicans that they must “try harder” to woo Hispanics—which supposedly means granting a blanket amnesty to illegal aliens.
Hispandering, therefore, is not just an idea, it is an ideology and an ideology is a difficult thing to combat.
And that is why we should see the defeat of Gabriel Gomez as a victory for patriotic immigration reformers. It illustrates the utter foolishness of the GOP elite’s Hispanic strategy.
After all, if Hispandering by Latino Republicans does not win any Hispanic votes, then why will work any better when white candidates engage in it? Ted Cruz got elected in heavily Hispanic Texas, but he’s a committed opponent of amnesty. Hey, why not follow his lead?
Running for national office is a huge commitment. How many people want to be the next Mitt Romney, hiring pricey consultants who advise you on how to alienate voters and blow elections (enriching them in the process)?
You can’t keep losing and stay in business forever. Eventually, candidates are going to look for better campaign advice.
Like that circus clown tossing the banana peels, Hispanic Outreach has become a stale routine that has bored white voters, and even Hispanic voters, into staying home and not voting on Election Day.
If the GOP is to have any future, then they must reject these Rasputins of the Right who preach this nonsense.
Patriotic immigration reform will not achieve victory without their defeat.
And they certainly suffered a defeat this week in Massachusetts.
Matthew Richer (email him) is a writer living in Massachusetts. He is the former American Editor of Right NOW magazine.

Last polls on Ky very important‏

A very interesting post from lbp.action@yahoo.com about Kentucky's polling on immigration reform. Remember, the state's two Senators are Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Tea Party Favorite Rand Paul. This follows this post about the true demographics of the 2012 presidential election.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are

shown HERE.

POLL:  KENTUCKY VOTERS OVERWHELMINGLY REJECT

KEY PARTS OF SENATE IMMIGRATION BILL

 

 lbp.action@yahoo.com

The state's Republicans (about 40% of  the voters) are so strongly opposed to so many parts of S. 744, that a Republican official who supports the bill would be inviting a Primary challenge. And Independents (about a fifth of the voters) are almost as strongly opposed as are Republicans. 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

No. 1 Objection: Only 8% of likely voters agree with the bill's increase of total immigration.

 

In 1990, Congress increased immigration above the traditional average of around 3 million a decade to around 10 million.   S. 744 would triple that in the first decade to 33 million.  The poll shows virtually no support for any kind of increase, let alone one of that magnitude.

 

Only 10% of Democrats in the state believe immigration should be increased. Only 4% of Republicans.

 

During Judiciary Committee markup of the bill, Sen. Sessions argued that Congress ought to be reducing immigration, not increasing it at this time.  He was ridiculed in the mainstream media for making an argument far out of the mainstream. But Sen. Sessions' conclusion that immigration is too high is state voters' most popular choice among options of too low, too high or about right.

 

64% of Republicans indicate that current immigration of 1 million a year is too high.

 

"Too high" is also the top choice of the state's men, women, whites, blacks, every educational level, Democrats, Independents, Evangelicals, Protestants, Catholics and people of no religion.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

No. 2 Objection: Only 21% of likely voters agree that the nation is in danger of labor shortages and needs more immigrant workers.

 

The main point of most of S. 744 is to increase foreign workers for occupations up and down the skill ladder.  Sen. Sessions argued in committee that it makes no sense to offer 33 million lifetime work permits in the first decade after the bill when 20 million Americans who want a full-time job still can't find one.  Kansas voters strongly support Sen. Sessions on that point.

 

72% of the state's voters disagree with the need for more immigrant workers while21% agree.

 

There is virtually no passionate feeling for the bill's insistence on more foreign workers.

 

45% STRONGLY disagree while only 7% STRONGLY agree. The passion ratio is 6-1 against the bill on this point.

 

No demographic group -- education, religion, age, race, political, gender -- agrees with the Gang of Eight's assessment of a shortage of American workers.

 

80% of Republicans (and 77% of Independents) disagree with more immigrant workers.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

No. 3 Objection: Only 18% of likely voters agree with the bill's offering work permits to illegal immigrants before implementing enforcement measures at the workplace and border.

 

The Judiciary Committee rejected several amnedments to require some or all of the enforcement promises in the bill to occur before the 11 million illegal aliens are given legalization and work permits.  25% of the state's voters on another question answered that they support giving work permits to illegal immigrant workers at some time, but a significant percentage of them are opposed to doing so until "enforcement at the borders and workplace must be implemented first."

 

80% of Republicans chose enforcement-first before even "considering" giving work permits, while 9% supported the bill's work permits first.

 

Independents favored enforcement-first by 67% to 20%. 

A very interesting post from www.VDare.com about Laura Ingraham exposing Facebook's CEO using his influence and money to increase immigration. This follows this post about America becoming like Mexico in many ways. This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read the two very interesting books that are shown HERE.

Laura Ingraham: Zuckerberg Ad Revenue Silencing "Conservative" Talk Show Hosts

http://www.vdare.com/posts/laura-ingraham-zuckerberg-ad-revenue-silencing-conservative-talk-show-hosts

By Patrick Cleburne

Laura Ingraham: Champion for America

In the opinion of our Talk Radio correspondent, Laura Ingraham has emerged as the Patriotic leader in this venue on the Amnesty/Immigration Acceleration Bill.

Today she said the unsayable. Our man’s version

Laura Ingraham: Certain people are bought and paid for. And I would submit that applies to media figures as well.... This [Zuckerberg ad] is playing on a conservative radio show? How much are they dropping on conservative radio shows.... Some of the conservative radio folks have clammed up. Where are they?

Huge money is being spent repeatedly broadcasting the Zuckerberg/Rubio lies. The IRS commotion gives the suspects an easy excuse. Any alleged conservative host running this propaganda and avoiding the Gang Bill needs to be questioned.

Patriots should call them!

Ingraham specifically excepted Mark Levin. Breitbart carried a powerful story on Levin last night:  Exclusive--Levin: McConnell 'Orchestrating' Immigration Bill 'from the Shadows' by Matthew Boyle May 21 2013

Make no mistake, the ruling class wants to ram this down our throats, and that includes the GOP so-called leaders.

Laura Ingraham is not carried everywhere. A good way of accessing her in the internet is to go to the Tunein.com site and search for “Laura Ingraham Show”. Alternatively search there for WTNT.

• Yes, Virginia, (Dare) People Are Opposing Obama-Rubio Amnesty