A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about the refugee and asylum clauses in immigration. This follows this post about LEGAL and Illegal Immigration. This follows this post about actions to stop the Gang of Eight Bill, SB 744.  This follows this post about the release of illegal immigrant felons from prison by ICE. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE!

Protest The Refugee/Asylee Scandal That Produced The Boston Bombers—Tell The State Department To Stop The Insanity!

http://www.vdare.com/articles/protest-the-refugeeasylee-scandal-that-produced-the-boston-bombers-tell-the-state-departmen

By Paul Nachman

Americans have two days to intervene in their own affairs—specifically, to protest the refugee/ asylee scandal that, among other atrocities, produced the Boston Bombers.
If asked to describe VDARE.com's theme and purpose in one sentence, I'd say: "The site exists to document, vividly, that every aspect of the U.S. immigration regime amounts to a victimization of the American people ... and to press for immigration sanity in the national interest."
Our refugee and asylum programs constitute a major element in that victimization.  This particular, long-running scandal finally received a massive surge of publicly beneficial exposure from the April 15 Boston Marathon bombings and the subsequent revelation that the perps were beneficiaries, via their parents, of asylum—and, of course, generous public benefits.
But VDARE.com has been covering the abuse of asylum and refuge since at least 2002.  That August, in EOIR Immigration Court -- Implementing the permanent amnesty, Juan Mann wrote:

International alien smuggling enables virtually anyone in the world without legal documents to bypass the system of U.S. consular refugee processing abroad. Aliens who simply appear without documents at any U.S. land border or airport on American soil can request asylum through the "credible fear" process, be released from custody, travel on to another city, and perhaps later appear for a hearing to be awarded asylum by an EOIR immigration judge. The potential for abuse of the current system is so great that the INS "credible fear" and EOIR asylum process has the potential to become the greatest back-door amnesty program of all.

Over the years, VDARE.com’s Thomas Allen, who specializes in this subfield, has written some twenty articles and blogs about the wide spectrum of outrages.  And our prolific Brenda Walker has frequently focused on this area, including, most recently, Burmese Refugees Flood Iowa Town to Fill Tyson Jobs.
My own "favorite" refugee/asylee story is of the Kurd who fled his native Iraq, landed first in Iran, stowed away on a ship to Brazil, lived in Brazil for a while, then stowed away again on a ship to New York.  Only upon reaching the U.S. did he apply for asylum, which was granted—at least provisionally, a year later.[ Tortured Iraqi Fugitive Given U.S. Sanctuary,  By Mark Fritz, LA Times, April 17, 1998]
(The "abuse of asylum and refuge" was the theme for the Summer 1997 issue of The Social Contract quarterly.  Articles by Norman Matloff, James Walsh, James Robb, Jack Martin, and Don Barnett should be helpful antidotes if you have low blood pressure.  The PDF versions are more readable than the HTMLs.)
So how is this obnoxious topic going to warm you up for the Amnesty/ Immigration Surge death match that's just ahead?
Well, 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Wednesday, May 8 is the deadline for your emailed and faxed public comments regarding the Fiscal Year 2014 refugee admissions program to the State Department's Delicia Spruell (spruellda@state.gov  or fax (202) 453-9393).
That's also the deadline—if you live in the Washington, DC area and could attend the May 15 meeting itself to glower at the bureaucrats—for reserving a seat, by contacting Ms. Spruell.  Details are in this brief announcement.
On Sunday, May 5, I emailed Ms. Spruell my observations and questions about the program.  The questions are implicitly criticisms that the public isn't being provided with essential and internally-consistent data about the program's burden on taxpayers.  My note to Ms. Spruell is appended to this article, as an example, but your input doesn't need to be anywhere near as long as mine.
Beyond the niggling numerical points I focused upon in my email, here are several possible themes—courtesy of Don Barnett, who's a real expert on refuge and asylum abuses—that you could choose from to incorporate in your input, recasting the ideas into your own words:

• Implement a National Governors Association recommendation calling for consultation with state and local communities before refugees are resettled in a community. Local and state entities should have the right to refuse resettlement.
• Discourage “secondary migration”—when refugees move to a different location within the U.S. immediately after being resettled, usually to join an existing enclave of their own countrymen. This causes unplanned and unfunded demands on social services at the “secondary migration” destination. It could be largely prevented by allowing access to social services only in the original state for some period of time after arrival.
• Non-governmental organizations [“NGOs”; e.g. Catholic Charities; Lutheran Immigrant and Refugee Services; Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society; et al.] that process incoming refugees for a living, so to speak, and their umbrella and spin-off organizations should be barred from lobbying Congress on refugee policy. They should have no role in selecting individuals for refugee resettlement.
• Congress must clarify (again) that resettlement to the United States is a last option, limited to individuals in extreme danger and made available only after the failure of all efforts to return home or to settle in the region where the refugee currently resides.  U.S. resources should be directed primarily toward helping refugees “integrate in place”—wherever they are currently— or return to their countries of origin.
• Congress must involve itself in determining a fixed ceiling for annual admissions. Currently Congress lets the Executive Branch set the annual refugee quota—a number that, astonishingly, has gone up sharply since September 11, 2001.  Currently, the White House can set whatever number it wants for refugee admissions each year.  A firm annual ceiling of 20,000 would still leave the United States the leading resettlement country in the developed world.

As the redoubtable Ann Corcoran, hyper-productive proprietress of the Refugee Resettlement Watch blog wrote recently:
Do not be silent!  The US State Department holds a hearing, usually in May, largely populated by the refugee contractors telling sob stories and looking to boost the number and variety of refugees (not to mention the contractor’s income) to be admitted to the US in the upcoming fiscal year. … Your testimony can be long or short, detailed or general, but get something in by the deadline of 5 p.m. May 8th!
So come on, VDARE readers!  Let's flood 'em with (polite) outrage, perhaps keying on the Boston Marathon events!

Below is the email I sent to the State Department.  I've added the links for their possible benefit to VDARE.com's readers.  Note that I'm sending copies of my letter to my senators and representative, along with a cover letter. 
This is important because it lets the bureaucracy know that their proprietary subject is becoming visible.  And it should be done by snail mail or fax (instead of easily-deletable emails).  For timely receipt, it's best that snail mail be sent to district offices instead of Washington, DC because of the security-induced delays in getting physical mail through to Capitol Hill offices.

 [my street address]
 Bozeman, MT 59715
 5 May, 2013
To Delicia Spruell:
I'm writing to comment on the FY 2014 U.S. Refugee Admissions Program.
What I say here is heavily informed by an encounter I had in early 2003. At a conference on immigration and assimilation hosted by the Claremont Institute and held at Chapman College in Orange, CA, I met Professor Jan Ting, then and now a law professor at Temple University and formerly the Assistant Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service under President George H. W.. Bush. Learning of his pedigree, I asked Professor Ting, "Is it true what I've heard, that 90% of refugee and asylum cases are fraudulent?"  He instantly replied, "95%."
In other words, most "refugees" and "asylees" weren't endangered in their home countries. They simply want to live in the U.S., because it's a better deal for them economically.
This basic fact—that asylees and refugees frequently take cynical advantage of the American public's goodwill—has finally received widespread and much needed public exposure via the bombing of the Boston Marathon.  The two young men responsible were present in the U.S. only because their parents had received LPR status as asylees.  Notably, and consistent with what Professor Ting had said, the parents have, in the meantime, returned to whence they came, strongly implying that their request for asylum had been fraudulent.
This is not an isolated case nor a new phenomenon: For example, in 1995, former State Department (U.S.I.A.) employee Don Barnett wrote in The Social Contract quarterly, "At any given time about 20,000 of the all-expenses-paid refugee visas have been awarded to former Soviets who have decided they don't want to leave just now. The visas remain in effect indefinitely allowing the holder to leave at his or her convenience."  People who choose to leave their domiciles “at their convenience” are clearly not being persecuted and are at no hazard to life or limb!
Following are two specific questions spurred by reading and comparing several documents found online: the DoS/HHS(ORR)/DHS Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2013 (henceforth, "the three-agencies report")[PDF link], the DHS Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2012: Legal Permanent Residents (Tables 6 and 7) [link; tables, linked within, are Excel spreadsheets], and the DoS Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration's [PRM] Summary of Refugee Admissions as of 30 April, 2013 [link, an Excel spreadsheet].  (I assume that the proposed-admissions document for FY2014 will be similar in scope and content to that FY2013 document.)

—Refugee numbers are grossly inconsistent among these documents.  Take FY2011 as an example.  According to both the three-agencies report (Table II) and the PRM summary, the total count was 56,224.  But the DHS yearbook gives the refugee total as 113,045 (Table 6) and 105,528 (Table 7).  Yet the DHS has also signed onto the three-agencies report!  Nor is this gross discrepancy unique to FY2011.

Therefore, Question #1: Why are the numbers of humanitarian admissions tabulated by the different departments so disparate?

—The footnote on page "i" of the three-agencies report says "Detailed discussion of the anticipated social and economic impact?, including secondary migration, of the admission of refugees to the United States is being provided in the Report to the Congress of the Refugee Resettlement Program, Office of Refugee Resettlement, Department of Health and Human Services."  [Emphasis added.]  But my careful online search failed to turn up such a document.

A footnote on page 58 of that report says "[The 'refugee resettlement'] category ... does not include costs associated with the ... Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Medicaid, or Supplemental Security Income programs," thus reinforcing the point that major costs of refugee resettlement—indeed, probably the dominant costs—aren't being revealed to the public.
Getting the refugee numbers correct (see my Question #1) has an obvious bearing on the costs burden.  I see from that same footnote on page 58 that the Office of Refugee Resettlement [ORR] also serves  "asylees, Cuban and Haitian entrants."  Thus even if those DHS refugee numbers are grossly high, the PRM and the three-agencies-report numbers may actually be lowball, since the combined numbers of refugees and asylees are in the same numerical territory as DHS's refugee-only numbers.
Putting these points together leads to Question #2: Why is the taxpaying American public systematically denied  information revealing the true cost to us of the humanitarian-admissions programs?
Sincerely,
Paul Nachman
PNBL48@hotmail.com

 Copies by U.S. mail to:

• Senator Max Baucus
• Senator Jon Tester
• Representative Steve Daines
• US Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security
• US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

The Tea Party, Timothy McVeigh, and Tainted History

The Tea Party, Timothy McVeigh, and Tainted History

A very interesting article reviewing this book which was previously reviewed here which follows this article about the blame of the right wing for the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, and this article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence that follows this previous post about it.. This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read another very interesting book HERE

The Tea Party, Timothy McVeigh, and Tainted History

BLOGGER'S NOTE: SEE ALSO What’s the FBI Hiding? Agency Claims it “Lost” Videotape of OK City Bombing

 

By Jayna Davis

Anyone waving a placard or voicing dissent against the Obama administration dare not protest too loudly. President Bill Clinton has reignited the incendiary rhetoric of April 19, 1995. He effectively sealed his second White House bid in 1996 by blaming conservative talk radio for inciting the heartland bomber Timothy McVeigh. Now, fifteen years later, the Democratic playbook promises to claim far more victims. Only this time, hardworking Americans stand in the crosshairs.

In a recent CNN interview, the former commander-in-chief sounded a battle cry to the political left, press and pundits alike: Vilify the Tea Party, deeming its membership capable of the violent rampage of the Oklahoma City bomber. This stigma imperils the most influential grassroots movement in modern history. Nothing threatens to muzzle free speech more than being stereotyped a "Tim McVeigh wanna-be."

For me, this political correctness run amok triggers déjà vu. The smear campaign represents an instant replay of the backlash that I endured as a TV news reporter on the trail of the infamous John Doe 2. I was branded a "racist" for pursuing leads that illustrated how Iraqi intelligence agents, soldiers who served in Saddam Hussein's army during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, infiltrated the United States in order to recruit and assist Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols in executing the worst act of terror in 20th-century America.

What I discovered shatters the Tim McVeigh mold as an "angry white male" who vented his hostility through published letters to newspaper editors -- and soon thereafter, crossed the threshold from peaceful discontent to wholesale mass murder. Instead, copiously researched evidence, as outlined in my book The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing, exposes McVeigh as the ultimate traitor, acting in collusion with al-Qaeda terrorists and hostile foreign governments such as Iran and Iraq.

The decorated Bradley gunner openly expressed to an Army buddy during Operation Desert Storm that he "wanted to become a mercenary for the Middle East because they paid the most." Upon returning from the Persian Gulf War, he failed the cut for the elite Special Forces. The combat hero suffered a blow to the ego from which he would never recover.

The lanky, awkward teenager from upstate New York had joined the military to shake the childhood stigmas of ordinariness and anonymity. Beneath his clean-cut persona, he harbored a warped sense of empathy for Osama bin Laden, the first World Trade Center mastermind Ramzi Yousef, and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. During his incarceration, McVeigh penned personal essays unveiling his deep-seated sympathies for Middle Eastern terrorists that fueled his anti-government zealotry. He unabashedly expressed regret for the killing two Iraqi enemy combatants, for which he earned the Bronze Star.

Jailhouse interviews recently broadcasted by MSNBC confirm McVeigh's obsessive need for notoriety. Shortly before his 2001 execution, he granted unlimited access to two authors of his biography in order to dictate how history would portray his role as the Oklahoma City "super bomber." McVeigh lauded himself as an emotionless executioner, an ingenious mastermind, and the author of his own fate.

Demented pride impelled the American terrorist to fire off letters to the press following my appearances on cable news programs. His ire inflamed as I announced to a nationwide audience that Osama bin Laden, Iraq, and Iran sponsored the Oklahoma City operation. My investigation demeaned the Army sergeant's status and relegated his role to that of a mule, or rather, a button-pusher. In the lexicon of the intelligence community, Timothy McVeigh was nothing more than a "lily-white" delivery boy -- someone who had no ostensible ties to a Middle Eastern terrorist organizations, and thereby could operate below the law enforcement radar screen. He was a handpicked dupe, set up to take the fall in order to save his Islamic collaborators from prosecution. Bill Clinton's FBI ensured just that.

The Bureau failed miserably in its prodigious quest to find McVeigh's legendary accomplice, John Doe 2. It soon became evident that federal agents conducted a myopic manhunt bent on collaring a "homegrown" third terrorist of Caucasian, not foreign, descent. In early 1996, the Bureau conducted an unprecedented investigation in a herculean effort to connect a religious compound of white separatists and a band of Aryan Republican Army bank robbers to the Oklahoma City bombers. After all, they were cut from the same cloth as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. These right-wing extremists indubitably fit the profile of the angry white men who would avenge their hatred of the establishment by destroying a federal complex.

After conducting twenty-five thousand witness interviews, the FBI could not find one witness who tied the neo-Nazi suspects to downtown Oklahoma City, Timothy McVeigh, the Ryder truck, getaway vehicles, or the bombsite. All had irrefutable alibis. In short, the FBI failed to produce one eyewitness account, fingerprint, motel registration log, or phone record linking these alleged conspirators to the commission of the crime. The judge who presided over Terry Nichols' 2004 state murder trial ruled the Bureau's pursuit of additional domestic terrorists amounted to nothing more than "hyperbole and a dry hole."

The FBI compliantly accepted the court's rebuke rather than take receipt of my voluminous dossier indicting Iraqi soldiers in the crime. In 1997, when I attempted to surrender the witness statements and corroborative evidence, the FBI flatly refused to take it. But I persisted, and in 1999, FBI Agent Dan Vogel accepted the witness affidavits and investigative file. From there, the documents simply vanished.

To this day, the FBI has failed to investigate the multiple sightings of Iraqi Republican Guardsman Hussain Al-Hussaini in the presence of Timothy McVeigh prior to the bombing, exiting the bomb-laden Ryder truck the morning of April 19, and escaping the ill-fated Murrah Building in a getaway vehicle pursued by the FBI in an all-points-bulletin issued for Middle Eastern terrorists. More significantly, two federal court rulings establish that this Iraqi soldier has no provable alibi for the morning of the bombing.

The FBI never questioned Hussain Al-Hussaini and has refused repeated requests from Congress and the press to clear him officially of complicity in the Murrah Building bombing. Why? It is my firm belief that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno should be called upon to answer that question. Meanwhile, the Democrats will continue to spin the fictional portrait of McVeigh to the party's advantage.

Undoubtedly, Tim McVeigh espoused hate. He advocated civil disobedience. He called for armed resistance to punish a republic he no longer trusted to protect the liberty of its citizenry. But by no means does his crime symbolize anything other than the maniacal act of an unstable individual living on the fringe of society. For Bill Clinton to draw a comparison between a bloodthirsty terrorist and Tea Party conservatives, many of whom are senior citizens on walkers, is nothing short of a national outrage.

However, those threatened by the mounting ranks of dissatisfied voters will continue to stoke the flames of demagoguery. McVeigh was a soldier of fortune -- a far cry from the peaceful citizens of the Tea Party. Yet until the evidence embodied in The Third Terrorist is prosecuted and validated in a courtroom setting, Americans who hold their elected leaders to account will continue to bear the onus of "Tim McVeigh wanna-bes." The historical record, as written by the Clinton Department of Justice, leaves the door open to malign protestors as latent terrorists just awaiting the impetus to act. This insidious distortion of truth demands redress.

The time has arrived to exorcise the ghosts of Oklahoma City and bring to account the Arab terrorists who butchered innocent Americans and the officials who suppressed the evidence of their guilt

A Book Review :While America Sleeps

A Book Review :While America Sleeps

This is a book that I recommend because it points out so many enemies of modern American society including Reconquistas and Jihadists, as well as others who internally are opposed to American society. You can get this at your library here or from a bookstore such as Amazon at the links below.

While America Sleeps: How Islam, Immigration and Indoctrination Are Destroying America From Within

The authors table of contents says it all, and I have never seen a better more organized laydown of content than this one, so good that I am spelling it out here because for many, the table of contents alone is sufficient (but I urge buying the book, it is very readable and thought-provoking).

An Economy in Hock
La Reconquista (the Reconquering, Mexico has gotten all the way back to the Guadalupe-Hidalgo line)
Absolishing Self-Defense
Subordinating Ourselves
Subordinating Our Culture
Subordinating Our Country
An Ideology of Submission
Enforcing the Ideology
Disabling Americans
Spreading the Ideology
Can America Be Saved?
Reclaiming the Individual
Reclaiming the Economy
Reclaiming the Government
If All Else Fails

This is an enormously important book that speaks to the heart and mind of every person of any race or faith who believes in America the Beautiful, in dignity, justice, and liberty for all. That's not what we stand for today, and that is a travesty of epic proportions.

 This is one book you ignore at your own risk

By bookloversfriend

Format:Paperback

The emphasis in this book is on HOW: how militant Islamists get into the U. S., how they spread to cities and towns throughout the U.S., how they persuade us they are moderates, how they operate inside the U. S., how they manipulate our laws to protect their activities, how they exploit "political correctness" to escape detection.

Also, how the illegal immigration industry operates, how illegals are bussed to cities and towns throughout the U. S., how they are financed, how they have teams of free lawyers standing by to manipulate the laws of the U. S. to avoid deportation.

The INDOCTRINATION chapters include a detailed analysis of "political correctness" (which this book calls "Dhimmism" but might more properly be called "postliberalism"). We all use the term "political correctness" and think we know what it means, but most people have only a vague idea what it is, and we need to know. This book tells you in detail what it is and what it is not, how and why it developed, how it is enforced, and how it is spread. The book tells you how colleges, schools, news media, law schools, courts and Hollywood came to be dominated by "political correctness", how more and more people are being indoctrinated into this new ideology, and how the minds of people so indoctrinated actually work, including why it is impossible to reason with them. Your own children and grandchildren are being indoctrinated every day, not only in school, but from TV, pop/rock/rap music, and other sources.

Most urgently, the book tells you how "political correctness" protects the militant Islamists and illegal immigrants and guarantees that nothing will be done to stop them.

If you think somebody or other is taking care of these problems or will take care of them, then you need to read this book to find out you're living in a dream. If you think the government is so strong that you don't need to worry, then you're part of the sleeping America. People are already being hurt in many ways, but the worst is yet to come. The situation is not hopeless--not yet, but it will be in the near future if most people continue to be misinformed.

A very interesting post from www.DebbieSchlussel.com about the man of interest in the Boston Marathon bombing. This follows this post about the U.S. supplying weapons to the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran . For more about what is happening in the nation now click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.

Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi: Meet the Saudi Man of Interest; FOX News Wipes Name, Story From Website

By Debbie Schlussel
As you know by now, a Saudi national here on a student visa is a “person of interest” in yesterday’s Boston Marathon terrorist attack and also a potential future “great American” in today’s Marco Boob-io immigration amnesty bill. Early today, FOX News and FOX Boston reported the Saudi’s name, but then removed the entire story from all FOX News and FOX affiliate websites because we gotta protect the “Religion of Pieces.” You know that if this was your average White guy–say, Richard Jewell–we’d know everything about him including whether he’s in boxers or briefs by now. But FOX is often “down wit da jihadist struggle” given that its second largest individual shareholder is jihad-lovin’ Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal (that’s why I call it PAWNN–the Prince Al-Waleed News Network). But I saved the FOX News article, which appeared at this link on FOX Boston’s site, and the Saudi’s name and I don’t share the political dhimmi-rectness of FOX News. Here’s the relevant part:

A source close to the investigation confirms to FoxNews.com the man whose apartment was searched is considered a person of interest in the case, and is the same person of interest Fox News confirmed earlier authorities are guarding at a local hospital. The source confirmed to FoxNews.com that the person of interest is Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, a 20-year-old Saudi. His Facebook page identifies him as a current or former student at the New England School of English. He is believed to have entered the country on a student visa.


The source stressed that Alharbi is a person of interest, not a suspect, and said he suffered serious injuries in the explosion. Investigators were seen leaving the Revere house early Tuesday carrying brown paper bags, plastic trash bags and a duffel bag, according to the Associated Press.

By the way, Alharbi’s Facebook page (join me on Facebook) is filled with photos of him at Six Flags Amusement Park (famous for its Muslim Day) and what appears to be a smaller version of the Disney Castle. Was he casing the joints? Do you really think the FBI agents carried out a lot of bags from his apartment because they like used clothes?
What You Get, When You Click on Deleted FOX News Story on Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi . . .

Hmmm . . . why did FOX News remove the story? Maybe Alharbi’s daddy is buds with Prince Al-Waleed, or maybe the Prince called his bud Rupert Murdoch with this demand, like he did about the Muslim riots in France.
That’s how it goes. Alhamdillullah [praise allah].
In any event, I’m sure we’ll be told it’s all a misunderstanding, that this guy had “language and cultural barriers” or some other halal BS like that.